Skip to main content
  1. Right Decisions
  2. GGC - Clinical Guideline Platform
  3. Maternity
  4. Back
  5. Antenatal, general
  6. Anti-D Immunoglobulin Administration Following Potentially Sensitising Events and Routine Antenatal Anti-D Prophylaxis in RhD Negative Women (559)
Announcements and latest updates

Right Decision Service newsletter: April 2024

Welcome to the Right Decision Service (RDS) newsletter for April 2024. 

Issues with RDS and Umbraco access

Tactuum has been working hard to address the issues experienced during the last week. They have identified a series of three mitigation measures and put the first of these in place on Friday 3rd May.  If this does not resolve the problems, the second mitigation will be actioned, and then the third if necessary.

Please keep a lookout for any slowing down of the system or getting locked out. Please email myself, mbuchner@tactuum.com and onivarova@tactuum.com if you experience any problems, and also please raise an urgent support ticket via the Support Portal.

Thank you for your patience and understanding while we achieve a full resolution.

Promotion and communication resources

A rotating carousel presenting some of the key RDS tools and capabilities, and an editable slideset, are now available in the Resources for RDS providers section of the Learning and Support toolkit.

Redesign and improvements to RDS

The redesign of RDS Search and Browse is still on-track for delivery by mid-June 2024. We then plan to have a 3-week user acceptance testing phase before release to live. All editors and toolkit owners on this mailing list will be invited to participate in the UAT.

The archiving and version control functionality is also progressing well and we will advise on timescales for user acceptance testing shortly.

Tactuum is also progressing with the deep linking to individual toolkits within the mobile RDS app. There are several unknowns around the time and effort required for this work, which will only become clear as the work progresses. So we need to be careful to protect budget for this purpose.

New feature requests

These have all been compiled and effort estimated. Once the redesign work is complete, these will be prioritised in line with the remaining budget. We expect this to take place around late June.

Evaluation

Many thanks to those of you completed the value and impact survey we distributed in February. Here are some key findings from the 65 responses we received.

Figure 1: Impact of RDS on direct delivery of care

Key figures

  • 93% say that RDS has improved evidence-informed practice (high impact 62%; some impact 31%)
  • 91% report that RDS has improved consistency in practice (high impact 65%, some impact 26%)
  • 85% say that RDS has improved patient safety (high impact 59%, some impact 26%)
  • Although shared decision-making tools are only a recent addition to RDS, and only represent a small proportion of the current toolset, 85% of respondents still said that RDS had delivered impact in this area (53% high impact, 32% some impact.) 92% anticipate that RDS will deliver impact on shared decision-making in future and 85% believe it will improve delivery of personalised care in future.

Figure 2 shows RDS impact to date on delivery of health and care services

 

Key figures

These data show how RDS is already contributing to NHS reform priorities and supporting delivery of more sustainable care.

Saving time and money

  • RDS clearly has a strong impact on saving practitioner time, with 90% of respondents reporting that this is the case. 65% say it has a high impact; 25% say it has some impact on time-saving.
  • It supports devolved decision-making across the multi-professional team (85% of respondents)
  • 76% of respondents confirm that it saves money compared, for example, to investing in commercial apps (54% high impact; 22% some impact.)
  • 72% believe it has impacted already on saving money and reducing waste in the way services are delivered – e.g. reducing costs of referral management, prescribing, admissions.

Quality assurance and governance

  • RDS leads are clear that RDS has improved local governance of guidelines, with 87% confirming that this is the case. (62% high impact; 25% some impact.)

Service innovation and workforce development

  • RDS is a major driver for service innovation and improvement (83% of respondents) and has impacted significantly on workforce knowledge and skills (92% of respondents – 66% high impact; 26% some impact).

New toolkits

A few examples of toolkits published to live in the last month:

Toolkits in development

Some of the toolkits the RDS team is currently working on:

  • SARCS (Sexual Assault Response Coordination Service)
  • Staffing method framework – Care Inspectorate.
  • SIGN 171 - Diabetes in pregnancy
  • SIGN 158 – British Guideline on Management of Asthma. Selected sections will be incorporated into the RDS, and complemented by a new chronic asthma pathway being developed by SIGN, British Thoracic Society and NICE.
  • Clinical pathways from NHS Fife and NHS Lanarkshire

Please contact his.decisionsupport@nhs.scot if you would like to learn more about a toolkit. The RDS team will put you in touch with the relevant toolkit lead.

Quality audit of RDS toolkits

Thanks to all of you who have responded to the retrospective quality audit survey and to the follow up questions.  We still have some following up to do, and to work with owners of a further 23 toolkits to complete responses. An interim report is being presented to the HIS Quality and Performance Committee.

Implementation projects

Eight clinical services and two public library services are undertaking tests of change to implement the Being a partner in my care app. This app aims to support patients and the public to become active participants in Realistic Medicine. It has a strong focus on personalised, person-centred care and a library of shared decision aids, as well as simple explanations and videoclips to help the public to understand the aims of Realistic Medicine.  The tests of change will inform guidance and an implementation model around wider adoption and spread of the app.

With kind regards

Right Decision Service team

Healthcare Improvement Scotland

Anti-D Immunoglobulin Administration Following Potentially Sensitising Events and Routine Antenatal Anti-D Prophylaxis in RhD Negative Women (559)

Warning
Please report any inaccuracies or issues with this guideline using our online form

The following guideline refers to non-sensitised RhD negative women in pregnancy. Women who are confirmed to have immune (allo) do not require anti-D.

Adequate prophylaxis is effective in reducing the incidence of sensitisation.

Consent should be obtained before anti-D administration in all events.

Patient information document and green card should be given to patient following a RhD negative result at booking.

Indications for administration – Potentially Sensitising Events (PSEs)

Anti-D Ig 500IU should be given after the following:

1) Vaginal bleeding with associated severe pain

2) Evacuation of retained products of conception/molar pregnancy

3) Invasive prenatal diagnostic procedures e.g. amniocentesis, CVS

4) Other invasive procedures eg. embryo reduction, insertion of shunts, intrauterine transfusion, laser therapy for TTTS, transabdominal cerclage

5) Antepartum haemorrhage

6) Abdominal trauma – sharp/blunt, open/closed

7) External cephalic version

8) Therapeutic termination of pregnancy 

  • Anti-D Ig 500 IU is required for women having a medical or surgical TOP after 10+0 weeks’ gestation.
  • Anti-D Ig 500 IU is required for women having a surgical TOP up to and including 10+0 weeks’ gestation.
  • Do not give anti-D Ig to women having a medical TOP up to and including 10+0 weeks’ gestation.

9) Spontaneous miscarriage, threatened miscarriage ≥12+0weeks (if the gestational age is different to the size of the fetal pole on ultrasound, the ultrasound measurements should be used)

  • Complete spontaneous miscarriage
    • Prior to 12+0 weeks – anti-D Ig not required.
    • ≥ 12+0 weeks - anti-D Ig 500 IU is required.
  • Medical management of miscarriage
    • Anti-D Ig is not required for solely medical management of miscarriage prior to 12+0 weeks.
    • Anti-D Ig 500 IU should be given to all women receiving medical management of miscarriage ≥12+0 weeks.
  • Surgical management of miscarriage/Manual Vacuum Aspiration (MVA)
    • Anti-D Ig 500 IU should be given to women undergoing a surgical procedure for management of miscarriage or MVA. This is also the case for women undergoing evacuation of uterus for molar pregnancy.
  • Threatened miscarriage  
    • Anti-D Ig 500 IU should only be considered in women with threatened miscarriage and a viable fetus prior to 12+0 weeks if PV bleeding is recurrent, heavy and/or associated with significant abdominal pain.
    • Anti-D Ig 500 IU should be given to women with a threatened miscarriage after 12+0 weeks gestation.

10) Ectopic pregnancy 

  • Anti-D Ig 500 IU should be given to women who have surgical management of an ectopic pregnancy.
  • Anti-D Ig is not required for women who have solely medical management of ectopic pregnancy or a pregnancy of unknown location (PUL).

11) Intrauterine death (IUD) 

  • Diagnosis and delivery of an IUD at ≥20+0 weeks should be considered as 2 separate PSEs.
  • Therefore, anti-D Ig 500 IU should be given to women at the time of diagnosis of IUD, unless the patient presents in advanced labour.
  • At diagnosis of IUD ≥20+0 weeks, maternal bloods for Group & Save and Kleihauer should be taken.
  • At the point of diagnosis of IUD ≥20+0 weeks, Blood Bank would aim to process the request for anti-D in an urgent manner following a telephone call. There should be minimal delay for the patient. Ensure relevant details on the request form.
  • Please ensure Group & Save is repeated every 72hours until delivery.
  • Following delivery, maternal Group & Save and Kleihauer samples should be obtained and sent to Blood Bank. Bloods should be obtained 30-45 minutes following delivery.
  • Administration of anti-D Ig 500IU should be repeated within 72 hours of delivery.

12) Delivery of RhD positive baby or baby of unknown Blood Group

  • Following delivery, maternal Group & Save and Kleihauer samples should be obtained and sent to Blood Bank. The Kleihauer sample should be taken when sufficient time has elapsed to allow fetal cells to be distributed within the maternal circulation following delivery, or manual removal of placenta. A period of 30-45 minutes is considered adequate.
  • Cord bloods should also be obtained from baby to determine baby’s ABO and RhD type.
  • If cord samples cannot be obtained, document on maternal request form and the neonatologist must be contacted to obtain a newborn group sample from the baby. Every effort should be made to obtain cord blood to avoid unnecessary invasive sampling of baby. If the baby requires blood samples for any other reason eg sepsis or blood sugars, please obtain newborn group sample at the same time to avoid unnecessary sampling of the newborn.
  • If baby confirmed to be RhD positive, give anti-D Ig 500 IU within 72 hours of delivery.
  • If for any reason a sample from baby cannot be obtained, the baby should be assumed to be RhD positive for the purposes of anti-D Ig administration.
  • If the Kleihauer test indicates a FMH >4ml then further anti-D Ig will be required. The dose advised will be dependent on the estimated volume of FMH. A further repeat Kleihauer should then be taken 72 hours after administration of the additional anti-D Ig if given IM and 48hours if given IV to ensure clearance of fetal cells.
  • Any postnatal RhD negative patients leaving the hospital without receiving anti-D Ig should be discussed with an obstetric consultant.

13) Intra-operative cell salvage (full guideline here)

  • When intra-operative cell salvage is used during Caesarean section, reinfused blood may contain fetal red cells.
  • The volume of fetal red cells in reinfused blood can vary from 1-20ml.
  • It is therefore recommended that a minimum dose of 1500 IU anti-D Ig is administered after reinfusion of salvaged cells if baby group is confirmed as RhD positive (or blood group unknown).
  • Maternal samples for estimation of FMH should be taken 30 – 45 mins after reinfusion of salvaged red cells. Depending on the Kleihauer result, an additional dose of anti-D should be administered if necessary and additional follow up Kleihauer sent as appropriate.
  • It is important that clinicians inform Blood Bank if intra-operative cell salvage is being used to ensure that the correct dose of anti-D Ig is issued. This information should be added to the pre-operative maternal request for Group & Save/Crossmatch.

Timing of Administration

Anti-D should be given within 72 hours of a sensitising event. If, however, this does not happen some protection may be provided even if anti-D Ig is given up to 10 days later. Women who are known to already be sensitised should not be given anti-D Ig.

Dose of Anti-D

The standard dose is 500 IU intramuscularly. A 500 IU dose of anti-D is capable of suppressing immunisation of up to 4 mls of RhD positive fetal red cells. Intramuscular anti-D Ig is best given into the deltoid muscle. 

Doses of 1500 IU of anti-D Ig are administered for RAADP.

Doses of 1500 IU of anti-D Ig are administered following the use of cell salvage.

In women with severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count ≤30 × 109/L) or a history of a bleeding disorder such as severe Von Willebrand disease, anti‐D Ig should be administered IV or subcutaneously depending on whether a preparation suitable for IV use is available. Women with significant bleeding disorders such as Von Willebrand disease should be managed jointly with a haemophilia centre.

Recurrent/ongoing bleeding <12+

<12+0 weeks

See ‘Threatened miscarriage’ section above.

12+0 – 19+6 weeks

  • If discrete episodes of recurrent PV bleeding occur, each new PSE should be managed separately with a further dose of anti-D Ig 500 IU, regardless of the timing or dose of anti-D Ig given for previous events.
  • However, in the event of ongoing PV bleeding which is clinically judged to be as a result of the same potentially sensitising event (i.e. not suggestive of a new presentation or of significant change in the volume or pattern of the bleeding), anti-D Ig 500 IU should be given at a minimum of 6 weekly intervals. A plan for this should be documented in the notes by the patient’s obstetric consultant.

≥20+0 weeks

  • Follow guidance for 12+0-19+6 weeks above.
  • In addition to giving anti D Ig 500 IU at a minimum of 6 weekly intervals, Kleihauer testing should be performed after each bleed, or every two weeks if the bleeding is ongoing.
  • If the bleed is > 4mls, a further dose of anti-D is administered as advised by Blood Bank. All Kleihauer results > 4mls should be repeated 72 hours after the additional dose of IM anti-D and 48 hours after any additional dose given IV, and if still positive, should be discussed with the oncall haematologist.

Kleihauer Testing

This is not necessary under 20 weeks gestation but should be performed following events on or after 20+0 weeks in order to assess the extent of any fetomaternal haemorrhage and ensure sufficient anti-D has been administered. When the Kleihauer indicates a bleed > 4mls, the appropriate additional dose of anti-D should be administered as soon as possible, as advised by Blood Bank. A further repeat Kleihauer should then be taken 72 hours after administration of the additional anti-D Ig if given IM and 48hours if given IV to ensure clearance of fetal cells.

Routine Antenatal Anti-D Prophylaxis (RAADP)

Consent should be obtained before Anti-D is administered

  • Maternal Group & Save should be obtained prior to administering the RAADP. Do not wait for the results before giving a dose of anti-D Ig 1500 IU.
  • The routine use of RAADP should not be affected by previous anti-D prophylaxis given for sensitising events earlier in the pregnancy.
  • If the woman has had RAADP and has an antenatal sensitising event at any point in the pregnancy after this, then she should have a further dose of 500 IU anti-D (or more if the Kleihauer is > 4ml).
  • Administration of post-partum anti-D prophylaxis should not be affected by whether or not RAADP or AADP as a result of sensitising event have been given.

D variant red cells

Some individuals have weak expression of RhD and are known as D variants. These patients should be considered to be RhD negative and should receive anti-D for potentially sensitising events and RAADP while further testing is being carried out to confirm the RhD type. Once the RhD type has been confirmed, the lab will issue a report to state whether patient should be treated as RhD negative or positive and will issue anti-D as per current guidelines. It is important to note that such women may have been told previously that they are RhD positive if they are blood donors. This may give rise to confusion. If there is uncertainty about a patient’s RhD type this should be discussed with Blood Bank or the haematologist on call.

Passive Anti-D

Passive anti-D may be detectable in the maternal circulation for many weeks or months after administration of anti-D. Its presence should not be a contraindication to giving further doses of anti-D should the clinical situation arise. If there is any doubt in whether to administer a dose of antiD then the case can be discussed with the obstetric team and Blood bank.

Allergic response to Anti-D

Allergic reactions are very rare but severe hypersensitivity including anaphylaxis may occur. 

Symptoms of allergic or early signs of hypersensitivity reactions include generalised urticaria, tightness of the chest, wheezing, hypotension, and anaphylaxis.

Adrenaline should be available for immediate treatment of acute severe hypersensitivity reactions.

Clinical Risk Reporting

In the event of:

  • An inappropriate dose of anti-D being administered
  • A delay to anti-D being administered*
  • Anti-D not being administered at all to a patient who is eligible and consenting*
  • Anti-D being administered to a patient who is ineligible
  • An adverse reaction to a dose of anti-D

A Datix should be completed by the member of staff aware of the incident and the event should be reported to the Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) Committee by the clinical risk team.

*In the event of a patient having a delayed or missed dose of anti-D, an appointment should be made for the patient at 6 weeks post-delivery with her obstetric consultant to discuss the event and a sample for Blood Group & Save should be obtained to check for the presence of immune anti-D. This should be repeated at 6 months post-delivery to ensure they have not been sensitised.

Editorial Information

Last reviewed: 10/06/2021

Next review date: 01/12/2023

Author(s): Alison Hanlon.

Version: 3

Approved By: Obstetrics Clinical Governance Group

Document Id: 559

Related guidelines
References