Skip to main content
  1. Right Decisions
  2. Maternity & Gynaecology Guidelines
  3. Gynecology
  4. Back
  5. Gynaecology guidelines
  6. Surgical Management of First Trimester Miscarriage (894)
Announcements and latest updates

Right Decision Service newsletter: April 2024

Welcome to the Right Decision Service (RDS) newsletter for April 2024. 

Issues with RDS and Umbraco access

Tactuum has been working hard to address the issues experienced during the last week. They have identified a series of three mitigation measures and put the first of these in place on Friday 3rd May.  If this does not resolve the problems, the second mitigation will be actioned, and then the third if necessary.

Please keep a lookout for any slowing down of the system or getting locked out. Please email myself, mbuchner@tactuum.com and onivarova@tactuum.com if you experience any problems, and also please raise an urgent support ticket via the Support Portal.

Thank you for your patience and understanding while we achieve a full resolution.

Promotion and communication resources

A rotating carousel presenting some of the key RDS tools and capabilities, and an editable slideset, are now available in the Resources for RDS providers section of the Learning and Support toolkit.

Redesign and improvements to RDS

The redesign of RDS Search and Browse is still on-track for delivery by mid-June 2024. We then plan to have a 3-week user acceptance testing phase before release to live. All editors and toolkit owners on this mailing list will be invited to participate in the UAT.

The archiving and version control functionality is also progressing well and we will advise on timescales for user acceptance testing shortly.

Tactuum is also progressing with the deep linking to individual toolkits within the mobile RDS app. There are several unknowns around the time and effort required for this work, which will only become clear as the work progresses. So we need to be careful to protect budget for this purpose.

New feature requests

These have all been compiled and effort estimated. Once the redesign work is complete, these will be prioritised in line with the remaining budget. We expect this to take place around late June.

Evaluation

Many thanks to those of you completed the value and impact survey we distributed in February. Here are some key findings from the 65 responses we received.

Figure 1: Impact of RDS on direct delivery of care

Key figures

  • 93% say that RDS has improved evidence-informed practice (high impact 62%; some impact 31%)
  • 91% report that RDS has improved consistency in practice (high impact 65%, some impact 26%)
  • 85% say that RDS has improved patient safety (high impact 59%, some impact 26%)
  • Although shared decision-making tools are only a recent addition to RDS, and only represent a small proportion of the current toolset, 85% of respondents still said that RDS had delivered impact in this area (53% high impact, 32% some impact.) 92% anticipate that RDS will deliver impact on shared decision-making in future and 85% believe it will improve delivery of personalised care in future.

Figure 2 shows RDS impact to date on delivery of health and care services

 

Key figures

These data show how RDS is already contributing to NHS reform priorities and supporting delivery of more sustainable care.

Saving time and money

  • RDS clearly has a strong impact on saving practitioner time, with 90% of respondents reporting that this is the case. 65% say it has a high impact; 25% say it has some impact on time-saving.
  • It supports devolved decision-making across the multi-professional team (85% of respondents)
  • 76% of respondents confirm that it saves money compared, for example, to investing in commercial apps (54% high impact; 22% some impact.)
  • 72% believe it has impacted already on saving money and reducing waste in the way services are delivered – e.g. reducing costs of referral management, prescribing, admissions.

Quality assurance and governance

  • RDS leads are clear that RDS has improved local governance of guidelines, with 87% confirming that this is the case. (62% high impact; 25% some impact.)

Service innovation and workforce development

  • RDS is a major driver for service innovation and improvement (83% of respondents) and has impacted significantly on workforce knowledge and skills (92% of respondents – 66% high impact; 26% some impact).

New toolkits

A few examples of toolkits published to live in the last month:

Toolkits in development

Some of the toolkits the RDS team is currently working on:

  • SARCS (Sexual Assault Response Coordination Service)
  • Staffing method framework – Care Inspectorate.
  • SIGN 171 - Diabetes in pregnancy
  • SIGN 158 – British Guideline on Management of Asthma. Selected sections will be incorporated into the RDS, and complemented by a new chronic asthma pathway being developed by SIGN, British Thoracic Society and NICE.
  • Clinical pathways from NHS Fife and NHS Lanarkshire

Please contact his.decisionsupport@nhs.scot if you would like to learn more about a toolkit. The RDS team will put you in touch with the relevant toolkit lead.

Quality audit of RDS toolkits

Thanks to all of you who have responded to the retrospective quality audit survey and to the follow up questions.  We still have some following up to do, and to work with owners of a further 23 toolkits to complete responses. An interim report is being presented to the HIS Quality and Performance Committee.

Implementation projects

Eight clinical services and two public library services are undertaking tests of change to implement the Being a partner in my care app. This app aims to support patients and the public to become active participants in Realistic Medicine. It has a strong focus on personalised, person-centred care and a library of shared decision aids, as well as simple explanations and videoclips to help the public to understand the aims of Realistic Medicine.  The tests of change will inform guidance and an implementation model around wider adoption and spread of the app.

With kind regards

Right Decision Service team

Healthcare Improvement Scotland

Surgical Management of First Trimester Miscarriage (894)

Warning

Please report any inaccuracies or issues with this guideline using our online form

Surgical evacuation is considered to be a safe and effective management option in first trimester pregnancy loss.

Criteria

Surgical evacuation of uterus can be offered to women with a non continuing pregnancy at ≤13 weeks gestation. 

Where clinically appropriate, offer women a choice of manual vacuum aspiration under local anaesthetic (see MVA guideline), or surgical management in an operating theatre under general anaesthetic 2.

Surgical management of miscarriage (SMM) should be the first line-treatment for 2:

  • persistent excessive bleeding
  • haemodynamic instability
  • evidence of infected retained tissue
  • suspected gestational trophoblastic disease

Consent

Provide oral and written information to all women about the treatment options available and what to expect during and after the procedure 3.

The intended benefits and risks of the procedure and any extra procedures that may become necessary should be discussed. 

Written consent should be taken by a health professional familiar with the procedure.

Women who are obese, who have significant pre-existing medical conditions or who have had previous surgery must be made aware that the quoted risks for serious or frequent complications may be increased 2.

If the woman wishes to avoid a pregnancy after the procedure, sensitively counsel the woman regarding contraceptive options. SMM can be an opportunity for the insertion of intrauterine contraception. If the woman wishes this, additional consent should be obtained 2.

  • Discuss and +/- obtain consent for Pathology 1 and sensitive disposal of fetal remains 4. Ensure completion of the appropriate paperwork.
  • Offer Chlamydia screening to all women. If screening is accepted, women should be instructed on how to obtain a low vaginal swab.

Initial assessment

Anaesthetic pre-assessment should be performed to determine the patient’s suitability for a surgical procedure, and to identify risk factors. Where any increased risk factors or contraindications are identified, discussion with, or review by, the clinician / anaesthetist should be arranged as appropriate. 

Obtain baseline full blood count (FBC) and group and save (G&S). In addition, perform any other relevant investigation as indicated by patient clinical history.

Women with a BMI ≥ 30, a history of peptic ulceration or indigestion should receive prophylactic oral Omeprazole 20mg at 22.00hrs on the evening prior to surgery and repeated at 07.00hrs on the morning of surgery 5, 6 or as indicated by local Patient Group Directive.

Pre-operative Management

  • Determine change in clinical condition since pre-assessment. If, in the interim, there has been significant PV loss, consider rescan to confirm that surgical evacuation is still the most appropriate management option.
  • Complete admission portion of Assessment Booklet as locally indicated.
  • Administer Misoprostol 400 micrograms vaginally 3 hours prior to surgery OR sublingually 2–3 hours prior to surgery. (Refer to Appendix ‘Cervical Priming Guidance’ for caution / exclusion criteria).

Prophylactic Antibiotic Therapy Regime

Antibiotic prophylaxis should be offered using the following regimen7:   

  • All women should be offered Metronidazole 800mg administered orally 2 hours pre-operatively.

IF

  • Chlamydia NEGATIVE - no further antibiotics required.
  • Chlamydia POSITIVE - Doxycycline 100mg orally 12 hourly for 7 days post-op is the first line treatment.
  • Offer Azithromycin 1g orally as a single dose followed by 500mg daily for 2 days where chlamydia screening is declined, or in individuals who are allergic to or intolerant of tetracyclines 8.

Intraoperative Management

Bleeding at the time of the procedure or shortly after can be caused by uterine atony, coagulopathy or abnormal placentation, OR by complications such as uterine perforation, cervical laceration and retained pregnancy tissue2

If there is unexpected heavy bleeding at the time of surgery it should alert the surgeon to the possibility of gestational trophoblastic disease and in a woman with a history of caesarean section, a previously undiagnosed caesarean scar pregnancy2.

Management of uterine perforation will depend on the instruments used2

  • If a perforation occurs when using a dilator or curette then conservative management with antibiotics, observation and explanation to the patient may be appropriate.
  • If larger diameter instruments or a suction curette is used, or if there is significant revealed bleeding, then laparoscopy should be performed.

Post Operative Management

  • Observation of blood pressure and pulse should be monitored as per Early Warning Chart or as clinically indicated.
  • Assessment of pain levels and vaginal blood loss at least 1hourly or as clinically indicated.
  • Discharge may be 2 hrs post-operatively or when local Day Surgery discharge criteria are fulfilled9.
  • Non-sensitised rhesus (Rh) negative women should receive anti-D immunoglobulin where the uterus has been surgically evacuated1.
  • Ensure patient receives appropriate discharge information. Where possible, this information should be given in written form.
  • Ensure women and their families have an awareness of, and access to, appropriate support and counselling services.
  • Arrange appropriate follow up based on individual needs.
  • Inform all relevant primary care professionals of pregnancy outcome and management.

APPENDIX: Cervical Priming Prior to First Trimester Surgical Evacuation of Uterus

Introduction

Cervical priming with misoprostol (an E1 prostaglandin analogue) prior to surgical management of miscarriage (SMM) aims to reduce the possibility of injury to the uterus and cervix, and to improve the surgical ease of the procedure2.

It should be noted that although cervical priming has been shown to reduce both the need for mechanical dilation and the operating time, there have been no studies confirming a reduction in cervical or uterine injury2

Criteria

Cervical priming should be administered to all patients with a non-continuing pregnancy ≤12+0 gestation (CRL 65 mms or less), who wish surgical uterine evacuation and who have no contraindication to misoprostol administration.  

Patients with an incomplete miscarriage do not require any cervical preparation as the cervix is already dilated to a degree. 

Exclusion criteria

Severe asthma not controlled by therapy10

Known hypersensitivity to misoprostol or any component of the product11

Caution 

  • If aged >35yrs and a smoker.12
  • In patients with a history of cerebrovascular or cardiovascular disease.13
  • In patients with haemorrhagic conditions or on anticoagulation therapy.11
  • In patients with conditions that predispose them to diarrhoea, such as inflammatory bowel disease14.

Management. 

Misoprostol 400micrograms administered 15, 16, 17

  • vaginally 3 hours prior to surgery OR
  • sublingually 2–3 hours prior to surgery

Practitioners may consider oral or vaginal cervical preparation based on individual patient circumstance. 

Women may self-administer the vaginal tablets if preferred, without compromising efficacy15.

Misoprostol administered via the sublingual route is superior to vaginal administration but is associated with more gastrointestinal adverse effects15.  

Vaginal administration: Misoprostol 400 micrograms (2 x 200 micrograms tablets) in a single dose should be placed in the posterior fornix of the cervix and allowed to dissolve. Patient should therefore be advised to lie in semi recumbent position for 30 minutes post administration. 

Sublingual administration: Misoprostol 400 micrograms (2 x 200 micrograms tablets) in a single dose should be placed in the buccal pouch and allowed to dissolve over a 15 minute period. If not dissolved within this timeframe it may be swallowed with small sip of water.

Possible short term side effects 14, 18 usually in the several hours following administration:  

  • Abdominal cramp
  • PV bleeding
  • Nausea and/or vomiting (may affect the efficacy of the drug if it occurs within two hours of administration).
  • Diarrhoea or constipation
  • Headache
  • Rash
  • Malaise
  • Transient chills, shivering and fever
  • Dizziness

Post administration

Patient observation and assessment to ensure early identification of adverse reaction.  

Guidelines will be updated periodically to incorporate results of local audit and published literature. 

Editorial Information

Last reviewed: 03/12/2020

Next review date: 31/12/2025

Author(s): Claire Higgins.

Approved By: Gynaecology Clinical Governance Group

Document Id: 894

References
  1. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Green-Top Guideline No. 25. The Management of Early Pregnancy Loss. October 2006.
  2. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (Joint with AEPU), Consent Advice No.10, Surgical Management of Miscarriage and Removal of Persistent Placental or Fetal Remains. January 2018.
  3. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Clinical guideline 54, Ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage: diagnosis and initial management, December 2012, 1.5.19.
  4. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Disposal Following Pregnancy Loss Before 24 Weeks of Gestation. Good Practice Guideline No. 5. London: RCOG; 2005.
  5. British National Formulary (BNF). March 2008; 46:1.3.1.
  6. A.D, Brockutne J.W. Protection against pulmonary acid aspiration with Ranitidine. A new H2-receptor antagonist. Anaesthesia. 1982; 37: (1) 22-25.
  7. NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde Recommendation for antibiotic prophylaxis in Gynaecological Procedures. February 2020. 
  8. British Association for Sexual Health and HIV. Clinical Effectiveness Group, Update on the treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis infection. September 2018.
  9. I. Keston. Consultant Anaesthetist. The Queen Mother’s Hospital, Glasgow. Personal communication.
  10. Medical Abortion: A Fact Sheet. Reproduction Health Matters 2005; 13(26): 20
  11. Meuleman C, Jourdain P, Bellorini M, et al. Anaphylactic shock and myocytic necrosis after treatment with Artotec. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss 2002; 95:1230-3.
  12. Walch L, Labat C, Gascard JP, de Montreville V, Brink C, Norel X. Prostanoid receptors involved in the relaxation of human pulmonary vessels. Br J Pharm-col 1999;126:859-66
  13. Davey, A. Mifepristone and prostaglandin for termination of pregnancy: contraindications for use, reasons and rationale. Contraception 2006; 74: 20-4.
  14. https://bnf.nice.org.uk/drug/misoprostol.html#contraIndications
  15. RCOG The Care of Women Requesting Induced Abortion. Evidence-based Clinical Guideline Number 7. The Care of Women Requesting Induced Abortion. Nov 2011; 7.1.
  16. World Health Organisation. Safe abortion: technical and policy guidance for health systems. Second edition. 2012; 2.2.1.
  17. Singh K & Fong FY. Preparation of the cervix for surgical termination of pregnancy in the first trimester. Hum Reprod Update 2000; 6: 442–448.
  18. Exelgyn SmPC, Excelgyn Laboratories, France. 2006; 6:4.8