Skip to main content
  1. Right Decisions
  2. Maternity & Gynaecology Guidelines
  3. Maternity
  4. Back
  5. Common obstetric problems, intrapartum labour ward
  6. Use of Water for Labour and Birth (503)
Announcements and latest updates

Right Decision Service newsletter: April 2024

Welcome to the Right Decision Service (RDS) newsletter for April 2024. 

Issues with RDS and Umbraco access

Tactuum has been working hard to address the issues experienced during the last week. They have identified a series of three mitigation measures and put the first of these in place on Friday 3rd May.  If this does not resolve the problems, the second mitigation will be actioned, and then the third if necessary.

Please keep a lookout for any slowing down of the system or getting locked out. Please email myself, mbuchner@tactuum.com and onivarova@tactuum.com if you experience any problems, and also please raise an urgent support ticket via the Support Portal.

Thank you for your patience and understanding while we achieve a full resolution.

Promotion and communication resources

A rotating carousel presenting some of the key RDS tools and capabilities, and an editable slideset, are now available in the Resources for RDS providers section of the Learning and Support toolkit.

Redesign and improvements to RDS

The redesign of RDS Search and Browse is still on-track for delivery by mid-June 2024. We then plan to have a 3-week user acceptance testing phase before release to live. All editors and toolkit owners on this mailing list will be invited to participate in the UAT.

The archiving and version control functionality is also progressing well and we will advise on timescales for user acceptance testing shortly.

Tactuum is also progressing with the deep linking to individual toolkits within the mobile RDS app. There are several unknowns around the time and effort required for this work, which will only become clear as the work progresses. So we need to be careful to protect budget for this purpose.

New feature requests

These have all been compiled and effort estimated. Once the redesign work is complete, these will be prioritised in line with the remaining budget. We expect this to take place around late June.

Evaluation

Many thanks to those of you completed the value and impact survey we distributed in February. Here are some key findings from the 65 responses we received.

Figure 1: Impact of RDS on direct delivery of care

Key figures

  • 93% say that RDS has improved evidence-informed practice (high impact 62%; some impact 31%)
  • 91% report that RDS has improved consistency in practice (high impact 65%, some impact 26%)
  • 85% say that RDS has improved patient safety (high impact 59%, some impact 26%)
  • Although shared decision-making tools are only a recent addition to RDS, and only represent a small proportion of the current toolset, 85% of respondents still said that RDS had delivered impact in this area (53% high impact, 32% some impact.) 92% anticipate that RDS will deliver impact on shared decision-making in future and 85% believe it will improve delivery of personalised care in future.

Figure 2 shows RDS impact to date on delivery of health and care services

 

Key figures

These data show how RDS is already contributing to NHS reform priorities and supporting delivery of more sustainable care.

Saving time and money

  • RDS clearly has a strong impact on saving practitioner time, with 90% of respondents reporting that this is the case. 65% say it has a high impact; 25% say it has some impact on time-saving.
  • It supports devolved decision-making across the multi-professional team (85% of respondents)
  • 76% of respondents confirm that it saves money compared, for example, to investing in commercial apps (54% high impact; 22% some impact.)
  • 72% believe it has impacted already on saving money and reducing waste in the way services are delivered – e.g. reducing costs of referral management, prescribing, admissions.

Quality assurance and governance

  • RDS leads are clear that RDS has improved local governance of guidelines, with 87% confirming that this is the case. (62% high impact; 25% some impact.)

Service innovation and workforce development

  • RDS is a major driver for service innovation and improvement (83% of respondents) and has impacted significantly on workforce knowledge and skills (92% of respondents – 66% high impact; 26% some impact).

New toolkits

A few examples of toolkits published to live in the last month:

Toolkits in development

Some of the toolkits the RDS team is currently working on:

  • SARCS (Sexual Assault Response Coordination Service)
  • Staffing method framework – Care Inspectorate.
  • SIGN 171 - Diabetes in pregnancy
  • SIGN 158 – British Guideline on Management of Asthma. Selected sections will be incorporated into the RDS, and complemented by a new chronic asthma pathway being developed by SIGN, British Thoracic Society and NICE.
  • Clinical pathways from NHS Fife and NHS Lanarkshire

Please contact his.decisionsupport@nhs.scot if you would like to learn more about a toolkit. The RDS team will put you in touch with the relevant toolkit lead.

Quality audit of RDS toolkits

Thanks to all of you who have responded to the retrospective quality audit survey and to the follow up questions.  We still have some following up to do, and to work with owners of a further 23 toolkits to complete responses. An interim report is being presented to the HIS Quality and Performance Committee.

Implementation projects

Eight clinical services and two public library services are undertaking tests of change to implement the Being a partner in my care app. This app aims to support patients and the public to become active participants in Realistic Medicine. It has a strong focus on personalised, person-centred care and a library of shared decision aids, as well as simple explanations and videoclips to help the public to understand the aims of Realistic Medicine.  The tests of change will inform guidance and an implementation model around wider adoption and spread of the app.

With kind regards

Right Decision Service team

Healthcare Improvement Scotland

Use of Water for Labour and Birth (503)

Warning

Objectives

Both the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and the Royal College of Midwives support labouring in water for healthy women with uncomplicated pregnancies (RCM, RCOG, 2006).

The aim of this guideline to provide the best available evidence to assist midwives in facilitating the safe and effective use of water during labour and birth.

Audience

The following guideline is for use in hospital, community midwifery unit and homebirth settings.

Please report any inaccuracies or issues with this guideline using our online form

Rationale for guideline:

It facilitates evidence based, respectful midwifery care which in turn promotes viewing the birthing experience through a positive lens (Lewis et al, 2018).

Results in fewer epidurals and no evidence that labouring in water increases adverse outcomes for women or neonates (Cluett et al, 2018).

An option in all birthing settings in GGC alongside traditional birthing techniques.  Therefore, midwives need to be competent and confident in the use of the birthing pool for labour and birth (RCM, 2018).

Water birth can be beneficial to women with uncomplicated pregnancies, therefore may be a useful tool in reducing intervention rates (Maude, 2020).

Introduction

Water can provide a calming environment for women. Once in active labour, water can enhance uterine activity, provide effective pain relief; thereby reducing the need for an epidural and unnecessary intervention (Cluett et al, 2018) and the length of the first stage may be reduced.

Before using the pool

All midwives involved in the care of a woman choosing to labour and/or give birth in water should ensure that they are competent to care for the woman and are aware of local policies and guidelines, including emergency evacuation procedures.

Evidence around the use of water and suitability for a water birth should be discussed with the woman, preferably in the antenatal period and documented appropriately.  A full risk assessment should be carried out on admission and prior to entry of the pool to ensure suitability.

Criteria for women

Water birth is suitable for healthy women with uncomplicated pregnancies and labours, as defined by GGC Pregnancy Pathways.

Criteria for Mothers Suitable for Water Birth

 

 

 

  • Between 37+0 – 42+0 weeks gestation
  • Cephalic Presentation
  • Singleton Pregnancy
  • BMI <35
  • If there are significant medical/obstetric complications a combined discussion with obstetric consultant should take place

Group B Strep infections are not a contraindication to water birth (Cohain 2010), and midwives should follow the GGC GBS Intrapartum Antibiotic prophylaxis guideline.

VBAC (Vaginal birth after caesarean) in water is an option,  if there is IV access and continuous wireless waterproof electronic fetal monitoring.

Induction of labour. Women who present in labour following the administration of cervical prostaglandins or insertion of Cook’s Balloon may be suitable for water birth as long as there are no other contraindications, following a full risk assessment and an initial reassuring CTG. Women who require an oxytocin infusion are not suitable to use the water for labour or birth.

COVID 19. Where women have a current pyrexia or cough or current diarrhoea the recommendation is that they do not use the birthing pool (RCM 2021).

When a woman requests a waterbirth but does not meet the inclusion criteria, an individualised care pathway should be made with the multidisciplinary team and clearly documented.

Timing of entry to the pool

There is a common belief that early entry may reduce the length, strength, and frequency of contractions (Cluett et al, 2018).  It is believed that the most appropriate time to enter the water is when labour is established and contractions are increasing in length, strength, and frequency.

Women should not enter the water within two hours of a single opioid administration or if they remain drowsy. If the woman has had multiple doses, they should be advised to wait for four hours (NICE 2017).

Water temperature

Evidence suggests water temperature should be regulated by the woman’s comfort (Alfirevic and Gould 2006). Some research indicates that, during the first stage of labour, the water should be between 36-37⁰C. Although, it is widely recommended that the temperature should be between 37-37.5⁰C for second stage and should not exceed 37.5⁰C at any point (NICE 2017).

The water temperature should be recorded hourly and following any top up of water. The ambient room temperature should be comfortable for the woman.

Maternal temperature should be recorded hourly as per intrapartum pathways. If the temperature rises above 1⁰C from the baseline temperature the water must be cooled down or the woman must be asked to leave the pool until her temperature returns to normal.

Management of the 1st and 2nd stage of labour

A maternal temperature of 37.8 or higher should prompt exiting the pool and managed as per the maternal sepsis guideline.

The fetal heart should be monitored using waterproof Doppler and in accordance with the guidelines for fetal monitoring. The guidelines for continuous wireless waterproof electronic fetal monitoring should be used for high risk women, including hourly peer CTG reviews.

The woman should be encouraged to leave the pool to empty her bladder at regular intervals.

Frequent drinks should be encouraged to prevent dehydration.

Vaginal Examination should be performed out of the water.

A “Hands off” approach at delivery is recommended. Do not feel for cord – the baby will be born spontaneously.

The baby should be slowly and gently guided to the surface, face first.

Undue traction on the cord should be avoided.

If the woman raises herself out of the water following delivery of the baby’s head she must not re – immerse herself.

If there is lack of descent/advancement of the head the woman should be asked to stand out of water.

If there are any concerns with restitution and delivery of the shoulders the woman should stand, clear of the water and- be transferred out of the pool.

Following birth, assess baby as per neonatal resuscitation guidelines and initiate as required.

Please refer to Appendix 1 for criteria for exiting pool.

Management of the 3rd stage of labour

Women who have experienced an uncomplicated labour and birth should be able to choose a physiological 3rd stage. This may take place in or out of the pool.

If an active 3rd stage is required, no oxytocic drugs should be given in the pool.

Examination of the perineum should be performed on exiting the pool and allow one hour before commencing perineal repair if required, unless there is excessive bleeding. A prontosan soak can be applied to the perineum during this time.

Infection control

All midwives should be aware of infection control implications when facilitating a water birth.

If the pool is not used for 24 hours, water should be flushed through the system for 2 minutes.

Visible solids should be removed and if the midwife feels there is heavy contamination the woman should be advised to leave the pool.

Before the woman returns to the water, the pool must be emptied, cleaned in accordance with current infection control recommendations and thoroughly dried before refilling.

Women with blood borne infection must have an individualised care plan by the MDT in place. Although the quantity of water will seriously reduce the risk from blood borne viruses, universal precautions should always be taken. Midwives should pay attention to transmission via sclera and should wear protective glasses for birth.

Moving and handling

Prior to entering the pool, it is important that all women are risk assessed including a manual handling assessment.

Any unnecessary manual handling whilst the woman is in the pool should be avoided. The woman should be encouraged to position the fetal Doppler herself, or to raise her abdomen out of the water for the midwife to position it.

The area around the pool should be kept dry; any spills should be wiped up immediately to prevent any slips.

Women who develop complication(s) during their labour or birth should be advised to exit pool while they are able to do so.

The midwife should not attempt to remove the woman from the pool if she is unable to move. In this instance the midwife should:

  • Call for immediate assistance.
  • Maintain the woman’s safety.
  • Consider emptying or filling the pool. This will depend on the clinical situation.

Please refer to Appendix 2 for ‘Procedure for removal of a woman from the pool if she is unable to do so herself’.

Appendix 1: CRITERIA FOR EXITING THE BIRTHING POOL

Women should be asked to exit the pool if any concerns arise. This includes:

  • ANY concerns about maternal or fetal wellbeing including fetal heart rate concerns
  • Maternal pyrexia on more than two occasions
  • Concerns about progress of labour
  • Vaginal bleeding
  • Significant meconium stained liquor
  • Maternal hypertension >140/90mmHg
  • Request for epidural analgesia 
  • Cord prolapse
  • Shoulder dystocia

Women should be asked to exit the pool and low risk care should continue until it is appropriate to re-enter the pool:

  • Maternal request for opioid analgesia
  • Heavy contamination of pool
  • Technical difficulties with the pool

Appendix 2 PROCEDURE FOR MOVING OF A WOMAN FROM THE POOL

PROCEDURE FOR MOVING OF A WOMAN FROM THE POOL, IN A HOSPITAL SETTING, WHEN SHE IS UNABLE TO DO SO FOR HERSELF:

Staff should ensure the safe evacuation of a woman from a birthing pool to commence resuscitation procedure.

Summon help: Midwife should support the woman’s head to ensure her face is clear of water and maintain her airway. The emergency buzzer should be utilised and 2222 should be called to initiate a crash call.

Equipment to be used:

  • Trolley/bed
  • Evacuation Net
  • Slide Sheets

Minimum members of staff required to facilitate full evacuation, with the use of equipment – four

  • DO NOT DRAIN THE POOL, considering filling pool further – The buoyancy offered by the water will assist staff to position the net, and to support and turn the woman.
  • Staff member to prepare the trolley/bed in suitable position to receive the woman.
  • Slide sheets should be placed on the trolley/bed to assist with sliding woman onto the trolley/bed.
  • Two members of staff will position the evacuation net under the woman.
  • The midwife must move to one side of the woman but remain in charge of the airway.
  • Using clear commands e.g., “Ready, Steady, Slide”, slide the woman clear of the pool and onto the trolley/bed.
  • Remove the net and the slide sheets from under the woman once she is safely located on the trolley/bed.
  • Keep the woman warm with towels/blankets and assess.

PROCEDURE FOR REMOVAL OF A WOMAN FROM THE POOL, IN A HOMEBIRTH OR STAND-ALONE SETTING, WHO IS UNABLE TO DO SO FOR HERSELF:

It is important to utilise all personnel available which may include birth partner/s to facilitate evacuation process. It is likely that if evacuation is required, it is for resuscitation and so paramedic assistance is always required.

If there is only one midwife present (e.g., during first stage of labour) –

  • Apply a maternal neck float in order to keep her head out of the water.
  • Call 999 “Immediate threat to life”.

If there are two midwives present –

  • One midwife to hold the woman’s head free from the water and apply neck float
  • Second midwife should call 999 “Immediate threat to life”.

The first midwife applying a neck float when there are two midwives present allows for them to be free to assist with the evacuation. If there is no neck float available the steps should be followed, with a midwife supporting the woman’s head to ensure it remains clear of the water.

If the birthing pool in use is a ‘birth pool in a box’ (the most common type of birthing pool), once help has been called for, deflate the top and middle segments of the pool (if there are two Midwives present only deflate the middle section, due to the spillage which occurs with deflating two sections). When the segment(s) are deflated, the woman can then be removed from the pool by sliding over the remaining inflated segment(s) of the pool. This can be done, only in an emergency, by a single practitioner. However, as stated above it is important to make use of all personnel available including birthing partner/s to assist in the evacuation of the woman. Once the woman is out of the pool, assess and commence resuscitation as required.

Note if birthing pool is a la bassine, which has interconnecting vertical columns rather than circular compartments, they may not deflate individually. In an emergency, slowly deflate and attempt to maintain shape with pressure on top, in order to try to keep some of the water in.

There are no nets available when in a homebirth setting. There are, in most Home birth kits, neck floats available for use. Women are made aware of this when requesting the use of a pool at home. They are made aware of the difficulty of evacuation and that their partners and/or ambulance staff may be required to assist. Note, the Homebirth Team have never had to put an evacuation into practice at home as women would be advised to leave the pool early if in any way unwell. For example, feeling light-headed/bleeding/MEWS red score.

When evacuating a woman at home, be mindful of electrical equipment nearby.

Appendix 3: STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE - Care of Women choosing Water Immersion for Labour and Birth

Aim: To support Water Immersion for Labour and Birth for all low risk women, promoting uninterrupted physiological labour and decreasing pharmacological analgesia.

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE - Care of Women choosing Water Immersion for Labour and Birth (pdf)

Editorial Information

Last reviewed: 21/08/2023

Next review date: 31/07/2028

Author(s): Clare Monaghan.

Version: 2

Co-Author(s): Charlee Osola and Emma Ritchie.

Approved By: Maternity Governance Group

Document Id: 503

References

Cluett ER, Burns E, Cuthbert A. (2018) Immersion in water in labour and birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (5):CD000111.

Clews, Church and Ekberg (2020) Women and waterbirth: A systematic meta-synthesis of qualitative studies, Women and Birth, Volume 33, Issue 6,

Cohain, JS. Waterbirth and GBS. Midwifery Today with International Midwife.  2010-2011 Winter; (96):9-10

Dekker R. (2018) The evidence on: waterbirth.

RCM 2021 Waterbirth in the time of COVID February 2021 (rcm.org.uk)

Lewis L, Hauck YL, Crichton C, Barnes C, Poletti C, Overing H, Keyes L, Thomson B. (2018) The perceptions and experiences of women who achieved and did not achieve a water birth. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 18(1):23.

Maude, RM and Kim, M .2020 Getting into the water: a prospective observational study of water immersion for labour and birth at a New Zealand district health board. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Vol. 20 No. 312

NICE Clinical Guidelines: Intrapartum Care for healthy Women and babies; updated 2022.

Alfirevic, Z. and Gould, D. (2006). Immersion in water during labour and birth.