Skip to main content
  1. Right Decisions
  2. Neurology pathways
  3. Back
  4. Headache
  5. 2. Acute Treatment of Migraine in Primary Care
Announcements and latest updates

Right Decision Service newsletter: April 2024

Welcome to the Right Decision Service (RDS) newsletter for April 2024. 

Issues with RDS and Umbraco access

Tactuum has been working hard to address the issues experienced during the last week. They have identified a series of three mitigation measures and put the first of these in place on Friday 3rd May.  If this does not resolve the problems, the second mitigation will be actioned, and then the third if necessary.

Please keep a lookout for any slowing down of the system or getting locked out. Please email myself, mbuchner@tactuum.com and onivarova@tactuum.com if you experience any problems, and also please raise an urgent support ticket via the Support Portal.

Thank you for your patience and understanding while we achieve a full resolution.

Promotion and communication resources

A rotating carousel presenting some of the key RDS tools and capabilities, and an editable slideset, are now available in the Resources for RDS providers section of the Learning and Support toolkit.

Redesign and improvements to RDS

The redesign of RDS Search and Browse is still on-track for delivery by mid-June 2024. We then plan to have a 3-week user acceptance testing phase before release to live. All editors and toolkit owners on this mailing list will be invited to participate in the UAT.

The archiving and version control functionality is also progressing well and we will advise on timescales for user acceptance testing shortly.

Tactuum is also progressing with the deep linking to individual toolkits within the mobile RDS app. There are several unknowns around the time and effort required for this work, which will only become clear as the work progresses. So we need to be careful to protect budget for this purpose.

New feature requests

These have all been compiled and effort estimated. Once the redesign work is complete, these will be prioritised in line with the remaining budget. We expect this to take place around late June.

Evaluation

Many thanks to those of you completed the value and impact survey we distributed in February. Here are some key findings from the 65 responses we received.

Figure 1: Impact of RDS on direct delivery of care

Key figures

  • 93% say that RDS has improved evidence-informed practice (high impact 62%; some impact 31%)
  • 91% report that RDS has improved consistency in practice (high impact 65%, some impact 26%)
  • 85% say that RDS has improved patient safety (high impact 59%, some impact 26%)
  • Although shared decision-making tools are only a recent addition to RDS, and only represent a small proportion of the current toolset, 85% of respondents still said that RDS had delivered impact in this area (53% high impact, 32% some impact.) 92% anticipate that RDS will deliver impact on shared decision-making in future and 85% believe it will improve delivery of personalised care in future.

Figure 2 shows RDS impact to date on delivery of health and care services

 

Key figures

These data show how RDS is already contributing to NHS reform priorities and supporting delivery of more sustainable care.

Saving time and money

  • RDS clearly has a strong impact on saving practitioner time, with 90% of respondents reporting that this is the case. 65% say it has a high impact; 25% say it has some impact on time-saving.
  • It supports devolved decision-making across the multi-professional team (85% of respondents)
  • 76% of respondents confirm that it saves money compared, for example, to investing in commercial apps (54% high impact; 22% some impact.)
  • 72% believe it has impacted already on saving money and reducing waste in the way services are delivered – e.g. reducing costs of referral management, prescribing, admissions.

Quality assurance and governance

  • RDS leads are clear that RDS has improved local governance of guidelines, with 87% confirming that this is the case. (62% high impact; 25% some impact.)

Service innovation and workforce development

  • RDS is a major driver for service innovation and improvement (83% of respondents) and has impacted significantly on workforce knowledge and skills (92% of respondents – 66% high impact; 26% some impact).

New toolkits

A few examples of toolkits published to live in the last month:

Toolkits in development

Some of the toolkits the RDS team is currently working on:

  • SARCS (Sexual Assault Response Coordination Service)
  • Staffing method framework – Care Inspectorate.
  • SIGN 171 - Diabetes in pregnancy
  • SIGN 158 – British Guideline on Management of Asthma. Selected sections will be incorporated into the RDS, and complemented by a new chronic asthma pathway being developed by SIGN, British Thoracic Society and NICE.
  • Clinical pathways from NHS Fife and NHS Lanarkshire

Please contact his.decisionsupport@nhs.scot if you would like to learn more about a toolkit. The RDS team will put you in touch with the relevant toolkit lead.

Quality audit of RDS toolkits

Thanks to all of you who have responded to the retrospective quality audit survey and to the follow up questions.  We still have some following up to do, and to work with owners of a further 23 toolkits to complete responses. An interim report is being presented to the HIS Quality and Performance Committee.

Implementation projects

Eight clinical services and two public library services are undertaking tests of change to implement the Being a partner in my care app. This app aims to support patients and the public to become active participants in Realistic Medicine. It has a strong focus on personalised, person-centred care and a library of shared decision aids, as well as simple explanations and videoclips to help the public to understand the aims of Realistic Medicine.  The tests of change will inform guidance and an implementation model around wider adoption and spread of the app.

With kind regards

Right Decision Service team

Healthcare Improvement Scotland

2. Acute Treatment of Migraine in Primary Care

Warning

Background

  • Acute management of migraine in primary care should be based on SIGN guideline 155. 
  • Acute treatment of migraine is most effective when instituted early in an attack. 
  • Acute treatment should be limited to 8-10 days per month to prevent the development of Medication Overuse Headache 
  • Acute treatment can be stepped or stratified. In a stepped strategy, patients try an initial treatment, eg Aspirin 900mg, for 3 headaches before moving to a triptan if ineffective. In a stratified strategy patients chose the correct treatment for each individual attack, for example Aspirin 900mg for mild to moderate headache and a triptan for moderate to severe headache. 
  • Combinations of acute treatments can be helpful if individual treatments are not adequately effective e.g Aspirin or NSAID + Triptan, Aspirin/NSAID + antiemetic, Aspirin/NSAID + anti-emetic + triptan. 

Prevent Medication Overuse Headache

Limit acute treatment to less than 10 days per month (on average 2 days per week) to prevent development of Medication Overuse Headache.

Mild to Moderate Attacks

  • Consider NSAID such as 
    • Aspirin 900mg or 
    • Ibuprofen 400mg to 600mg 
    • Alternatives include naproxen 500mg or diclofenac 75mg 
  • If NSAIDs are contra-indicated, or not tolerated, consider paracetamol 1000mg orally (doses may need to be adjusted in patients weighing <50kg). Paracetamol can also be taken alongside aspirin or an NSAID as a combination treatment. 
  • For patients with an inadequate response and /or nausea / vomiting consider: 
    • addition of an anti-emetic e.g. metoclopramide 10mg orally, or prochlorperazine 10mg orally (independent effect on headache in addition to effect on nausea / vomiting) 
  • Opioids should not be used, as their use poses a risk of medication overuse headache 

Moderate to Severe Attacks

  • Consider a triptan if no contra-indication. We recommend sumatriptan 50-100mg orally, as the first line therapy (see attached notes on triptans) 
    • A triptan is considered effective if it reduces migraine in 3 out of 4 attacks.  

 

  • If a particular triptan is ineffective, consider EITHER 
    • an alternative triptan for future attacks (response to triptans is variable and people who fail to respond to one can try another), OR  
    • the combination of a triptan and antiementic e.g metoclopramide 10mg orally, or prochlorperazine 10mg orally (independent effect on headache in addition to effect on nausea / vomiting) AND / OR 
    • the combination of a triptan and NSAID. The best evidence for combined therapy is for naproxen 500mg with oral sumatriptan, but any NSAID / triptan combination, including aspirin, can be considered 

 

  • For patients with nausea and/or vomiting, consider:
    • addition of an anti-emetic e.g. metoclopramide 10mg orally, or prochlorperazine 10mg orally AND/ OR
    • user of an alternative triptan that is non-oral, such as nasal zolmitriptan 5mg or subcutaneous sumatriptan 6mg
    • use of an alternative NSAID that is non-oral such as diclofenac 75mg given once by intramuscular injection, can be be considered as an alternative to either an oral NSAID or aspirin

 

  • Triptan non-responders/ contraindications
    • Consider rimegepant in patients who have had inadequate relief to trials of at least 2 triptans and timing (take triptan early in headache), correct route of administration and combination treatment has been considered 
    • Consider rimegepant where triptans are contraindicated (see triptan contraindications below) 

 

  • Opioids should not be used, as their use poses a risk of medication overuse headache

Triptans

Please consider a prescription of a triptan, as per BNF. As a first option we recommend sumatriptan 50mg-100mg orally, as per SIGN 155.  

 

Types of triptan: There are seven different triptans  – almotriptan, eletriptan, frovatriptan, naratriptan, rizatriptan, sumatriptan, zolmitriptan. Response to different triptans is variable, and people who fail to respond to one triptan may respond to another. Therefore, if the patient does not respond to one triptan after use in three separate attacks, consider an alternative triptan. It can be worth trying triptans in sequence to find the most suitable of any individual patient. Note that naratriptan and frovatriptan have a slower onset but a longer half-life (approximately 5-6h for naratriptan; 25h for frovatriptan) and are therefore useful if patients describe recurrence of headache with a shorter acting triptan. All preparations come in tablet form. Sumatriptan also comes as a subcutaneous injection, sumatriptan and zolmitriptan come in nasal spray preparations (useful if prominent nausea) and rizatriptan and zolmitriptan also come in an orodispersible (melt) preparation. 

 

Adverse effects: Patients should be warned that triptan sensations and/or sedation may occur. Symptoms may include tightness in the jaw, throat, or chest, or pins and needles in the face. 

 

Cautions and contraindications: Triptans are contraindicated in coronary heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, or those with a history of stroke, and are cautioned in those with Raynaud’s phenomenon. They should not be used in patients with a history or moderate or severe hypertension.  Do not prescribe if blood pressure measurements are consistently above 140/90mmHg. While triptans are not licensed for adults greater than 65 years, there is no reason they can’t be used. Vascular risk factors are more common and should be actively looked for in this age group. 

 

How to Take Triptans: Triptans should be taken at the onset of the headache pain, and are more effective when taken early in an attack. Treatment frequency should be limited to two days per week (up to 2 doses can still be taken in any one day if needed) – more frequent use can result in medication overuse headache. If the first dose is ineffective, a second dose should not be taken for the same attack. If there is response to the first dose, but symptoms recur, a second dose may be taken provided there is a minimum of 2 hours between doses of almotriptan, eletriptan, frovatriptan, rizatriptan, sumatriptan, zolmitriptan, and 4 hours between doses for naratriptan. 

 

Drug Interactions (not exhaustive) 

Triptans should not be combined with monoamine oxidase inhibitors. 

Triptans are not contra-indicated with Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs). 

In patients taking propranolol, limit rizatriptan to the 5mg dose, and ensure a minimum separation of 2h between taking propranolol and rizatriptan. No more than 2 doses of rizatriptan should be taken in a 24h period. 

Please check BNF for drug interactions in those taking antibiotics, antifungal agents, cimetidine, antiretroviral agents, and verapamil – interactions vary between triptans. 

 

Although all UK summary of product characteristics caution against the concomitant use of triptans and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) / serotonin – norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) anti-depressants due to the risk of serotonin syndrome, in practice this combination can be taken safely in most patients. It is the opinion of the authors that this combination is not contra-indicated. Nonetheless, patients should be monitored for signs of serotonin syndrome if this combination is used. 

Gepants

Rimegepant is an oral selective calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist. It is thought to relieve migraine by blocking CGRP-induced neurogenic vasodilation, returning dilated intracranial arteries to normal by halting the cascade of CGRP-induced neurogenic inflammation which leads to peripheral and central sensitisation and / or by inhibiting the central relay of pain signals from the trigeminal nerve to the caudal trigeminal nucleus.

 

For patients who have not responded to adequate trials of at least 2 triptans or triptans are contraindicated then Rimegepant 75mg can be considered. 

 

The maximum dose is 75mg per day. If also on a CYP3A4 inhibitor (e.g., clarithromycin, itraconazole, ritonavir) then a second dose should be delayed for 48 hours. Rimegepant is generally well tolerated. Nausea is the main adverse effect. Hypersensitivity reactions have been reported but are uncommon occurring in <1%. 

 

Before Rimegepant is considered patients should have had an adequate trial of at least 2 triptans 

  • Ensure triptan has been taken early in the headache phase 
  • Ensure mode of administration is correct e.g. use nasal or subcutaneous in patients with early vomiting 
  • Consider combination treatment as detailed above 

The European Headache Federation (EHF) consensus on the definition of effective treatment of a migraine attack by a triptan is adequate symptom relief in 3 out of 4 headaches. Triptan resistance as inadequate symptom relief after trials of at least two triptans, and triptan refractory is inadequate symptom relief after trials of at least three triptans. 

Treatment of a prolonged migraine attack

Ensure adequate hydration 

 

For patients in whom oral preparations have been ineffective, parenteral NSAIDs (such as intramuscular diclofenac 75mg) or subcutaneous sumatriptan 6mg should be considered.  

 

Evidence also supports the use of parenteral antiemetics (intramuscular metoclopramide 10mg or prochlorperazine 10mg). 

 

Opioids have not been shown to be significantly effective and should not be used. 

 

Most patients should be able to be managed in the community. For patients, in whom standard treatment has not been effective and migraine is persisting, who attend the Emergency Department or are admitted to hospital, the following additional measures should be considered: 

  1. Ensure adequate hydration (consider iv saline) 
  2. iv/im antiemetic with metoclopramide 10mg or prochlorperazine 10mg (both anti-emetic and analgesic) if not already administered in the community 
  3. 6mg sc Sumatriptan (if the patient has already had an oral triptan this should be delayed to at least 1 hour after the oral dose) if not already administered in the community 
  4. Consider 1g iv Aspirin or 1g iv Paracetamol if sc Sumatriptan ineffective or contraindicated (may require admission to a medical ward), 75 mg im Diclofenac is an alternative in ED if not already administered in the community. 

References and further resources

SIGN 155 Pharmacological management of migraine – updated March 2023; includes clinician and patient guidelines 

url: Pharmacological management of migraine (sign.ac.uk)  

British Association for the Study of Headache (BASH) National Management System 2019; includes clinician and patient portals 

url: Headache UK 

Sacco et al. The European Headache Federation (EHF) consensus on the definition of effective treatment of a migraine attack and of triptan failure. The Journal of Headache and Pain (2022) 23:133 

Editorial Information

Last reviewed: 11/10/2023

Next review date: 01/04/2025