Skip to main content
  1. Right Decisions
  2. Neurology pathways
  3. Back
  4. Headache
  5. 3. Headache Prophylaxis Treatment Advice
Announcements and latest updates

Right Decision Service newsletter: April 2024

Welcome to the Right Decision Service (RDS) newsletter for April 2024. 

Issues with RDS and Umbraco access

Tactuum has been working hard to address the issues experienced during the last week. They have identified a series of three mitigation measures and put the first of these in place on Friday 3rd May.  If this does not resolve the problems, the second mitigation will be actioned, and then the third if necessary.

Please keep a lookout for any slowing down of the system or getting locked out. Please email myself, mbuchner@tactuum.com and onivarova@tactuum.com if you experience any problems, and also please raise an urgent support ticket via the Support Portal.

Thank you for your patience and understanding while we achieve a full resolution.

Promotion and communication resources

A rotating carousel presenting some of the key RDS tools and capabilities, and an editable slideset, are now available in the Resources for RDS providers section of the Learning and Support toolkit.

Redesign and improvements to RDS

The redesign of RDS Search and Browse is still on-track for delivery by mid-June 2024. We then plan to have a 3-week user acceptance testing phase before release to live. All editors and toolkit owners on this mailing list will be invited to participate in the UAT.

The archiving and version control functionality is also progressing well and we will advise on timescales for user acceptance testing shortly.

Tactuum is also progressing with the deep linking to individual toolkits within the mobile RDS app. There are several unknowns around the time and effort required for this work, which will only become clear as the work progresses. So we need to be careful to protect budget for this purpose.

New feature requests

These have all been compiled and effort estimated. Once the redesign work is complete, these will be prioritised in line with the remaining budget. We expect this to take place around late June.

Evaluation

Many thanks to those of you completed the value and impact survey we distributed in February. Here are some key findings from the 65 responses we received.

Figure 1: Impact of RDS on direct delivery of care

Key figures

  • 93% say that RDS has improved evidence-informed practice (high impact 62%; some impact 31%)
  • 91% report that RDS has improved consistency in practice (high impact 65%, some impact 26%)
  • 85% say that RDS has improved patient safety (high impact 59%, some impact 26%)
  • Although shared decision-making tools are only a recent addition to RDS, and only represent a small proportion of the current toolset, 85% of respondents still said that RDS had delivered impact in this area (53% high impact, 32% some impact.) 92% anticipate that RDS will deliver impact on shared decision-making in future and 85% believe it will improve delivery of personalised care in future.

Figure 2 shows RDS impact to date on delivery of health and care services

 

Key figures

These data show how RDS is already contributing to NHS reform priorities and supporting delivery of more sustainable care.

Saving time and money

  • RDS clearly has a strong impact on saving practitioner time, with 90% of respondents reporting that this is the case. 65% say it has a high impact; 25% say it has some impact on time-saving.
  • It supports devolved decision-making across the multi-professional team (85% of respondents)
  • 76% of respondents confirm that it saves money compared, for example, to investing in commercial apps (54% high impact; 22% some impact.)
  • 72% believe it has impacted already on saving money and reducing waste in the way services are delivered – e.g. reducing costs of referral management, prescribing, admissions.

Quality assurance and governance

  • RDS leads are clear that RDS has improved local governance of guidelines, with 87% confirming that this is the case. (62% high impact; 25% some impact.)

Service innovation and workforce development

  • RDS is a major driver for service innovation and improvement (83% of respondents) and has impacted significantly on workforce knowledge and skills (92% of respondents – 66% high impact; 26% some impact).

New toolkits

A few examples of toolkits published to live in the last month:

Toolkits in development

Some of the toolkits the RDS team is currently working on:

  • SARCS (Sexual Assault Response Coordination Service)
  • Staffing method framework – Care Inspectorate.
  • SIGN 171 - Diabetes in pregnancy
  • SIGN 158 – British Guideline on Management of Asthma. Selected sections will be incorporated into the RDS, and complemented by a new chronic asthma pathway being developed by SIGN, British Thoracic Society and NICE.
  • Clinical pathways from NHS Fife and NHS Lanarkshire

Please contact his.decisionsupport@nhs.scot if you would like to learn more about a toolkit. The RDS team will put you in touch with the relevant toolkit lead.

Quality audit of RDS toolkits

Thanks to all of you who have responded to the retrospective quality audit survey and to the follow up questions.  We still have some following up to do, and to work with owners of a further 23 toolkits to complete responses. An interim report is being presented to the HIS Quality and Performance Committee.

Implementation projects

Eight clinical services and two public library services are undertaking tests of change to implement the Being a partner in my care app. This app aims to support patients and the public to become active participants in Realistic Medicine. It has a strong focus on personalised, person-centred care and a library of shared decision aids, as well as simple explanations and videoclips to help the public to understand the aims of Realistic Medicine.  The tests of change will inform guidance and an implementation model around wider adoption and spread of the app.

With kind regards

Right Decision Service team

Healthcare Improvement Scotland

3. Headache Prophylaxis Treatment Advice

Warning

Background

  • Prophylactic management of migraine in primary care should be based on SIGN guideline 155. 
  • Oral prophylactic treatments should be started at a low dose and gradually increased (every 1-2 weeks) to the minimum effective maximum tolerated dose. 
  • Oral prophylactic treatments should be continued for at least 8 weeks at either the target dose or the highest tolerated dose before assessing efficacy.  
  • The effectiveness of prophylactic treatment may be limited by Medication Overuse Headache and this should be addressed in all patients 
  • If an oral prophylactic medication is effective, continue the medication and review at 6-12 months, at which time a trial of withdrawal should be considered. 
  • Combinations of prophylactic treatments can be helpful if individual treatments are not adequately effective. 
  • Plans for future pregnancy and contraception advice should be discussed when prescribing prophylactic treatments  

Pathway Recommendations

See Migraine Prophylaxis Pathway here.

The decision if or when to start oral prophylaxis should be tailored to the individual patient. As per
SIGN 155, there is no specific number of migraine days or migraine attacks per month that
indicates the need for prophylaxis. For example, patients with a few disabling migraine days per
month may elect to start treatment, but patients with a larger number of mild headache days per
month may not.


Migraine prophylactics may take many weeks to work. Judgment of efficacy should be made once
on the target dose or highest tolerated dose at 8 weeks. If the migraine prophylactic is ineffective
at 8 weeks, it should be weaned over 2 weeks and an alternative considered. If it is effective (i.e.
reduced monthly headache days by at least 30-50%) consider weaning the drug after 6 to 12
months (it should be weaned at the approximate rate it was increased). If side effects are
experienced after a dosage increase, decrease to the previous dose and then attempt a dosage
increase after 2 weeks. If patients are drowsy they should be warned to refrain from driving.

Contraception 

Migraine prophylaxis is usually not required in pregnancy, and certain medications are
contraindicated in pregnancy (detailed in the pregnancy section). We recommend consideration of
withdrawal of migraine prophylactics prior to conception. In particular, candesartan and topiramate
should be avoided in pregnancy. Many forms of contraception are not suitable in patients taking
topiramate (see section on Topiramate).

Medication Summary Table

 

Medication 

Amitriptyline 

Candesartan 

Propranolol 

Topiramate 

Starting dose 

10mg 

 

If side effects occur consider a switch to nortriptyline or dosulepin 

 

2-4mg 

 

Consider baseline U&Es*

10-20mg bd 

25mg 

 

Please see contraceptive advice in the notes section 

Suggesting Increment 

10mg every 1-2 weeks 

 

Some patients may require slower titration 

 

2-4mg every 1-2 weeks 

 

Consider intermittent monitoring of U&Es (see text below)

10-20mg bd every 1-2 weeks 

25mg every 1-2 weeks 

 

Target Dose 

50mg 

 

If well tolerated many patients benefit from a higher dose with further up titration up to 1mg/kg, typically a maximum of  100mg 

 

16mg 

80mg bd 

 

Some patients benefit from lower doses if they experience side effects at higher doses 

50mg bd 

 

If partially effective AND well tolerated further up titration to a maximum of 100mg bd  

 

*U&Es = urea and electrolyte blood testing 

Please note that this table may require scrolling to view all content.

Migraine Prophylactic Drugs

For a full list of contraindications and cautions we recommend review of the Summary of Product
Characteristics (SPC).


Amitriptyline
Start at 10mg and increase by 10mg every 1-2 weeks. The typical first target dose is 50mg. If well
tolerated many patients benefit from a higher with further up titration up to 1mg/kg, typically a
maximum of 100mg. If adverse effects occur, alternatives include nortriptyline, or dosulepin.
Dosulepin is only available in 25mg and 75mg doses.
Contraindications include concomitant use of monoamine oxidase inhibitors, recent myocardial
infarction, heart block, disorders of cardiac rhythm, and coronary artery insufficiency, and severe
liver disease. We also recommend avoiding use in those patients at risk of glaucoma, and QT
prolongation. Caution in those patients taking serotonergic drugs.
Patients should be warned about adverse effects which include constipation, difficulty with
micturition, arrhythmias, syncope, confusion, nausea, dry mouth, drowsiness and weight gain.
Patients should seek immediate medical attention if they are unable to micturate or experience
visual blurring.


Candesartan
Start at 2-4mg per day, increasing by 2-4mg every 1-2 weeks to a maximum of 16mg.
Caution in patients with renal artery stenosis, hypotension and renal impairment. Candesartan is
cautioned in those patients receiving lithium therapy, and in those who are taking medications
which increase serum potassium such as spironolactone.
Candesartan should not be used in pregnancy, and should be discontinued before planning a
pregnancy. Women of child bearing age should ensure appropriate contraception is in place.
Candesartan is not recommended during breast feeding.
Consideration of alternative agents should be considered in those with renal impairment and those
patients taking regular NSAIDS, since in such populations close monitoring or kidney function and
potassium would be required. If using candesartan in older patients, monitoring of kidney function
and potassium should be considered. Candesartan should be withheld if patients become acutely
dehydrated (e.g. during a diarrhoea and vomiting illness).
Adverse effects include hypotension, renal impairment and cough.

 

Propranolol
Start propranolol 10-20mg twice a day, gradually up-titrating by 10-20mg twice a day every 1-2
weeks, to a target dose of 80mg twice a day. Propranolol 80mg MR, increasing to 160mg MR is an
alternative. Some patients benefit from lower doses if they experience side effects at higher doses
Propranolol is contraindicated in a number of conditions including asthma, severe peripheral
vascular disease and should not be used in patients taking verapamil.
Adverse effects include bradycardia, hypotension, fatigue, sexual dysfunction, wheezing.


Topiramate
Start topiramate at 25mg daily, increasing by 25mg every 1-2 weeks, to a target dose of 50mg
twice a day. If partially effective and well tolerated further up titration to a maximum of 100mg
twice a day could be considered in selected patients
We do not recommend topiramate for use in patients who have a history of glaucoma or renal
stones or who have anorexia nervosa. Caution should also be exercised in patients with a history
of depression. There may be interactions with digoxin, metformin, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors,
and thiazide derivatives. There is a potential for serious interaction with sodium valproate.
Children exposed to topiramate in utero are at high risk of serious developmental disorders and
congenital malformations. It should not be used by women who are breast feeding as it can be
present in breast milk. Patients who may become pregnant should be appropriately counselled
and be on highly-effective contraception before commencing topiramate. Advice on contraception
is available from the Royal College of the Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Faculty of Sexual and
Reproductive Healthcare, https://www.fsrh.org/standards-and-guidance/fsrh-guidelines-andstatements/. At the time of writing the MHRA are reviewing the risks of topiramate in pregnancy.
For current contraceptive advice on patients prescribed topiramate check the MHRA website,
www.gov.uk/government/organisations/medicines-and-healthcare-products-regulatory-agency.
Adverse effects are common and include acute glaucoma, peripheral paraesthesias, fatigue,
nausea, diarrhoea or weight loss, taste change, concentration difficulties, word finding difficulties,
insomnia, anxiety, and depression.

Pizotifen
Although the evidence base is limited, pizotifen is widely used for the prevention of migraine and is
another option. A suggested starting dose in 0.5mg at night, with weekly increments of 0.5mg, to a
target dose of 1.5mg at night.

 

Sodium Valproate
Sodium Valproate should not be initiated for the prophylaxis of migraine in patients under the age
of 55.
Children exposed to sodium valproate in utero are at high risk of serious developmental disorders
and congenital malformations. It should therefore not be used during pregnancy. There is also a
risk of transient impaired fertility in men. The Commission on Human Medicines recommends that
no patients (male or female) under the age of 55 years should be initiated on valproate unless two
specialists independently consider and document that there is no other effective or tolerated
treatment. If prescribing sodium valproate in patients under the age of 55, the MHRA annual risk
form should be completed with the patient and repeated annually.
For current contraceptive advice on patients prescribed sodium valproate check the MHRA website,
www.gov.uk/government/organisations/medicines-and-healthcare-products-regulatory-agency

Referral to secondary care following prophylaxis

Where prophylactic treatment is not successful after three preventative medications from different classes, consider referral to relevant secondary care services as per local arrangements. 

The following diagram gives an overview of the secondary care pathway 

Secondary Care Pathway

  • Chronic migraine: 15 headache days per month, of which 8 must be migraine 
  • Episodic migraine: 14 or less headache days per month (high frequency episodic migraine 10-14 days per month) 

 

Patients should be defined as having episodic or chronic migraine using headache diaries. As per
the primary care pathway, initial prophylaxis should be with oral medications, but it is expected
that many agents will already have been tried in primary care. It is important to confirm that agents
have been tried for an appropriate duration and at an appropriate dose.


For selected patients with both episodic and chronic migraine, Flunarizine may be a treatment
option. It is an un-licenced medication and is prescribed and monitored through secondary care.
Its use is often targeted to specific migraine types such as vestibular migraine.


In selected patients with disabling high frequency episodic migraine, treatment with a gepant
(rimegepant or atogepant) or a monoclonal antibody to calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP)
can be considered if first line oral prophylactics are ineffective. Erenumab is only approved for
chronic migraine and prescription is limited to eptinezumab, fremanezumab or galcanezumab.
Botulinim toxin A is not approved for episodic migraine.


For patients with chronic migraine, atogepant, Botulinim toxin A or a monoclonal antibody to
CGRP can be considered. Unless contra-indicated, Botulinum Toxin A will usually be trialled
before monoclonal antibodies to CGRP. Where this is not currently feasible in a Health Board, this
must not be a barrier or result in delay for a patient’s treatment and the monoclonal antibody
agents can be trialled without a trial of Botulinum Toxin A. If patients do not respond to Botulinum
Toxin A, treatment with a monoclonal antibody to CGRP, or atogepant (if not already trialled)
should be considered where appropriate. If a first monoclonal antibody is deemed to be ineffective
it is reasonable to consider a trial of a second monoclonal antibody to CGRP, ideally one with a
different mechanism. Rimegepant is not approved for chronic migraine.


With effective migraine prevention patients can revert to episodic migraine and remain in episodic
migraine once preventative treatments are phased out / discontinued. In patients established on a
preventative treatment (oral preventatives, flunarizine, gepants, Botox and CGRP monoclonal
antibodies) the need for ongoing treatment should be evaluated on a yearly basis and
consideration given to a treatment holiday. If headache worsens on phasing out / stopping an
effective treatment this should be reinstated.

Oral prophylaxis (secondary care) (Migraine):

The recommendations for the prophylaxis of migraine in secondary care reflect the advice given
for prophylaxis of migraine in primary care, with sequential trials (if needed) of amitriptyline,
candesartan, propranolol, and topiramate being recommended (the order being tailored to the
individual patient). Additional options in secondary care are flunarizine and the gepants, as
discussed below.

Flunarizine
Flunarizine will be started and issued from the hospital pharmacy. The starting dose is either 5mg
or 10mg taken orally at night. The maintenance dose is 10mg at night.


It is not licensed in the UK for any indication, but is recognised in SIGN 155 as a viable and
effective migraine prophylactic agent. In selected patients ECG monitoring for the PR interval may
be performed.


Depression is a potential side effect and patients should be warned to stop the medication
if depression occurs. Severe depression occurs in a minority of people. Other potential
adverse effects include sedation, weight gain, tremor and Parkinsonism, nausea, dry mouth,
gingival hyperplasia, muscle aches and abdominal pain.


Concomitant use with beta blockers can cause bradycardia and impairment of cardiac conduction.
We do not recommend it for use in pregnancy.


Contraindications include:
Sick sinus syndrome
Second and third degree heart block
Heart failure
Hypotension
Severe left ventricular dysfunction
Cardiogenic shock
Porphyria
Parkinsonism

 

Cautions include:
 History of severe depression
 Current depression
 Those taking frequent dopamine antagonist anti-emetics (increased risk of extra-pyramidal
side effects)

 

Calcitonin Gene Related Peptide (CGRP) small molecule antagonists (gepants)
Galcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) small molecule antagonists (gepants) are a new class of
medications for the treatment of migraine. At the time of writing there are 2 such medications
available in Scotland. Atogepant 60 mg daily is approved for use in episodic and chronic migraine
whereas rimegepant 75mg every second day is approved for episodic migraine only. Where
patients using rimegepant have a migraine attack on a non-treatment day, if there are no
contraindications, then an additional dose can be used for acute treatment (refer to acute
treatment section for detail).


Gepants are thought to relieve migraine by blocking CGRP-induced neurogenic vasodilation,
returning dilated intracranial arteries to normal by halting the cascade of CGRP-induced
neurogenic inflammation which leads to peripheral and central sensitisation and / or by inhibiting
the central relay of pain signals from the trigeminal nerve to the caudal trigeminal nucleus.

 

Place in the migraine pathway
In selected patients with high frequency episodic migraine there is the option to treat with a gepant
(atogepant and rimegepant are both licensed in this scenario) if first line oral prophylactics are
ineffective. The CGRP monoclonal antibodies (as detailed below) are an alternative in patients
preferring an injectable treatment. Definitions of high frequency episodic migraine vary, but
patients are typically disabled by migraine and have 10 or more migraine days per month.


Atogepant can be considered for patients with chronic migraine who have not responded to first
line oral prophylactics. Botulinum toxin A and the CGRP monoclonal antibodies (as detailed
below) are alternatives in patients preferring an injectable treatment.


At the time of writing the Scottish Medicines Consortium have accepted the restricted use of
atogepant for patients with episodic migraine and chronic migraine where at least three
prophylactic treatments have failed. Rimegepant is restricted to patients with episodic migraine
where three prophylactic agents have failed. In patients with a partial effect to an oral prophylactic
agent, there is no requirement to stop that agent as long as the patient fulfils the criteria for
starting treatment with a gepant.


Medication overuse with analgesics should be addressed prior to initiating treatment.

 

Adverse Effects and Cautions
The gepants are generally well tolerated. Side effects noted with atogepant in the clinical trials
were constipation (7%), nausea (7%) and somnolence (5%). Atogepant should be avoided in
severe hepatic impairment and dose reduction to 10mg is required in severe renal impairment.
Baseline U&Es and LFTs should be considered if clinical concern. Routine monitoring is not
required for patients with normal renal and liver function. Nausea is the main adverse effect with
rimegepant, in 1.2% of patients. Hypersensitivity reactions have been reported but are uncommon
occurring in <1%.


If atogepant is prescribed along with a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor (e.g., clarithromycin, itraconazole)
or a strong OATP inhibitor (e.g., rifampicin, atazanavir, ritonavir, tipranavir, ciclosporin,
telmisartan) then the dose should be reduced to 10mg. Candesartan is a moderate OATP inhibitor
and concurrent use does not require dose reduction. For those where the strong CYP3A4 inhibitor
or OATP inhibitor is prescribed for a short course of treatment then it is acceptable to temporarily
stop atogepant and re-start it when the treatment course has completed.


Concurrent administration of rimegepant along with a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor (e.g.,
clarithromycin, itraconazole) is not recommended. If it is prescribed a with a moderate CYP3A4
inhibitor (erythromycin, fluconazole), a second dose should be delayed for 48 hours i.e. patients
should not be allowed to use concurrent acute treatment whilst on a moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor.


It is important to note that CGRP mediates vascular effects such as potentially mediating
vasodilatation, and having other potential effects on the vascular endothelium and vascular
smooth muscle. Whilst no cardiovascular adverse effects were noted in the trials and there is no
restriction to using gepants in patients with cardiovascular risk factors, we recommend a pretreatment BP and counselling regarding Reynaud’s. BP should be repeated at 3 months and
regularly thereafter (see CGRP monoclonal antibodies section).

 

Pregnancy and Lactation
Gepants should not be used in pregnancy. They have a short half-life and these agents should be
stopped 1 month prior to trying for a pregnancy. Due to insufficient safety data, routine use of
these agents in lactating women is not recommended.

Assessment of Response
Headache diaries should be used to assess the response. Response to treatment should be
assessed after 3 months using headache diaries.


If there is a good response to treatment, the agent may be continued for a pre-defined period as
determined locally (e.g. 12-24 months), before consideration of a treatment holiday. If there is
recurrence of headache during a treatment holiday, treatment may be re-initiated. Alternatively, if
there is a sustained positive response after a treatment holiday, the agent should not be reinitiated. In patients continuing treatment beyond 12-24 months, the need for ongoing treatment
should be evaluated on a yearly basis.


In HFEM if one agent is ineffective after 3 months a second agent can be trialled.


Criteria for continuing and stopping may take into account a number of indices:
1. Episodic migraine: reduction of at least 50% in frequency or severity of migraine.
2. Chronic migraine: reduction of at least 30% in frequency or severity of headache / migraine.

 

Dosing
Dosing should be performed as per the product license.


Atogepant 60mg daily is prescribed in primary care, either directly or on secondary care
recommendation depending on local arrangements. If the patient is on strong CYP3A4 inhibitor or
a strong OATP inhibitor (as detailed above) the dose is reduced to 10mg. If a short course of a
strong CYP3A4 inhibitor or a strong OATP inhibitor is planned (e.g. of an antibiotic) then it is
acceptable to temporarily stop atogepant and re-start it when the treatment course has completed.

Rimegepant 75 mg alternate days is prescribed in primary care, either directly or on secondary
care recommendation depending on local arrangements. Where patients have a migraine attack
on a non-treatment day, if there are no contraindications, then an additional dose can be used for
acute treatment, except where the patient is on a moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor.


Because of the small risk of somnolence, patients should be counselled regarding driving before
initiating treatment.

 

 

Botulinum Toxin A Therapy (chronic migraine only)

For chronic migraine, if patients are either ineligible for, or do not respond to the oral prophylactics, they should be considered for Botulinum toxin A. Botulinum toxin A therapy is licensed for chronic migraine only (defined as at least 15 headache days per month, at least 8 of which are migraine). Medication overuse should be addressed prior to initiation. Botulinum toxin A should be administered by appropriately trained clinicians using the PRE-EMPT protocol  

PREEMPT paradigm - fixed dose injection sites

An adequate trial consists of two cycles of treatment, three months apart. Headache diaries should be completed by patients before and during therapy. Patients should be evaluated 3 months after the second cycle, against pre-defined criteria (NICE Technology Appraisal Guidance TA260), to determine whether the treatment should be stopped or continued. Treatment should be continued where there is a good response to treatment but the patient continues to suffer a significant headache burden (e.g remains in a chronic migraine pattern). Treatment should be stopped if there is an insufficient response to treatment, or alternatively if there is an excellent response to treatment (e.g. patient has well controlled episodic migraine). If treatment is continued, headache diaries should be reviewed at each injection visit to confirm the ongoing indication for treatment. A treatment holiday should be considered at 2 years. 

 

Criteria for continuing and stopping may take into account a number of indices, for example 

  • Headache days (reduction of 30% or more is typically considered a good response) 
  • Migraine days or severe headache days (reduction of 30% or more is typically considered a good response) 
  • Disability (reduction of 50% or more is typically considered a good response) 

 

There is limited evidence for the safety of Botulinum Toxin A in pregnant or lactating women. Whilst the risk is likely to be low, treatment using Botox is not recommended in pregnant and lactating women. Practice varies between headache centres varies and some centres do use Botulinum Toxin A in selected patients who are pregnant or lactating. Before considering Botox in pregnancy or lactation the clinician should fully discuss the uncertainty and the potential risks with the patient, written consent should be obtained and the patient should be entered on a pregnancy registry. 

Monoclonal antibodies to Calcitonin Gene Related Peptide (CGRP) (migraine)

Background 

Monoclonal antibodies to calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) are a new class of medications for the treatment of migraine. At the time of writing there are 4 such medications available in Scotland. erenumab, fremanezumab and galcanezumab are provided by monthly subcutaneous injections. Fremanezumab can also be given quarterly. Eptinezumab is only available as a quarterly intravenous infusion. All medications target CGRP, a key neuropeptide involved in the pathogenesis of migraine. Erenumab is a monoclonal antibody directed toward the canonical CGRP receptor. Fremanezumab, galcanezumab and Eptinezumab are monoclonal antibodies directed toward the CGRP ligand. 

 

Place in the migraine pathway 

In the majority of centres, these agents should be trialled for patients with chronic migraine who have not responded to the oral prophylactics nor Botulinum toxin A. However, If Botulinum toxin A is unavailable, this should not be a barrier to treatment. At the time of writing the Scottish Medicines Consortium have accepted the restricted use of erenumab for patients with chronic migraine where at least three prophylactic treatments have failed. The SMC have accepted fremanezumab, galcanezumab and eptinezumab for patients with chronic and episodic migraine where three prophylactic agents have failed. In patients with a partial effect to an oral prophylactic agent, there is no requirement to stop that agent as long as the patient fulfills the criteria for start the monoclonal antibody treatment. However, medication overuse with analgesics should be addressed prior to initiating treatment.  

 

The specific choice of agent from the three which are available should be decided locally. Centres may benefit from developing dedicated clinics to pre-assess patients, provide training regarding injection technique, and to assess response. Injections are typically delivered to patients by a homecare service, and are self administered by patients at home. Patients will require a hospital admission (or a suitable alternative) to receive intravenous eptinezumab. 

 

In selected patients with high frequency episodic migraine there is the option to treat with a monoclonal antibody to CGRP (fremanezumab, galcanezumab and eptinezumab are licensed in this scenario) if oral prophylactics are ineffective. Definitions of high frequency episodic migraine vary, but patients are typically disabled by migraine and have 10 or more headache days per month. 

 

Adverse Effects and Cautions 

The cap of the erenumab pre-filled syringe / pen contains latex and should not be given to patients with a latex allergy. 

 

Although the monoclonal antibodies have a favourable side effect profile, a number of side effects should be noted. Patients should be warned about side effects including the risk of constipation (mainly with erenumab, but only occasionally severe enough to warrant treatment cessation), injection site reactions, itch, rash, and hair loss. There have been reports of anaphylaxis and angioedema. 

 

It is important to note that CGRP mediates vascular effects such as potentially mediating vasodilatation, and having other potential effects on the vascular endothelium and vascular smooth muscle. Patients with certain cardiovascular diseases were excluded from clinical trials and long term effects of these agents in such patients is unknown. There have been early reports in the post-marketing setting of increases in blood pressure after initiation of erenumab. We do not recommend the use of such agents in patients with uncontrolled hypertension, and use in patients with previous cerebrovascular and cardiovascular disorders is not advised until further safety data becomes available. Regular BP checks are recommended for patients on CGRP monoclonal antibodies to ensure hypertension does not develop. 

There is a small risk of hypersensitivity reactions during the infusion with eptinezumab. 

 

Pregnancy and Lactation 

Monoclonal antibodies to CGRP should not be used in pregnancy. Due to the long half-life, these agents should be stopped at least 6 months prior to pregnancy. Due to insufficient safety data, routine use of these agents in lactating women is not recommended. 

 

Assessment of Response 

Headache diaries should be used to assess the response. Response to treatment should be assessed after 3 months using headache diaries.  

If there is a good response to treatment, the agent may be continued for a pre-defined period as determined locally (e.g. 12-24 months), before consideration of a treatment holiday. If there is recurrence of headache during a treatment holiday, treatment may be re-initiated. Alternatively, if there is a sustained positive response after a treatment holiday, the agent should not be re-initiated. 

If one agent is ineffective after 3 months a second agent can be trialled. It is preferable for the second agent to be of a different class than the first. For example, if erenumab is ineffective, consider a trial of either fremanezumab or galcanezumab; if either fremanezumab or galcanezumab are ineffective, consider a trial of erenumab. The Scottish Medicines Consortium permits the use of fremanezumab, galcanezumab and eptinezumab for patients with high frequency episodic migraine. Where one of these agents is ineffective, the other may be tried. 

 

As with Botulinum Toxin A therapy, criteria for continuing and stopping may take into account a number of indices, for example 

  • Headache days (reduction of 30% or more is typically considered a good response) 
  • Migraine days or severe headache days (reduction of 30% or more is typically considered a good response) 
  • Disability (reduction of 50% or more is typically considered a good response) 

 

Dosing 

Dosing should be performed as per the product license. 

 

Erenumab is delivered as a subcutaneous injection using a pre-filled syringe or pen. The dose is either 70mg or 140mg monthly. 

Galcanezumab is delivered as a subcutaneous injection using a pre-filled pen. The recommended regimen is a 240mg loading dose, followed by 120mg monthly. 

Fremanezumab is delivered as a subcutaneous injection using a pre-filled syringe. The dose is either 225mg monthly or 675mg quarterly. 

Eptinezumab is delivered by intravenous infusion. The dose is 100mg quarterly. 

 

Occipital nerve block

There is currently conflicting evidence about the benefit of greater occipital nerve blocks in migraine headache. There are four small randomised controlled trials that assessed the short term benefit of GON blocks in people with migraine. They all used different regimens of treatment. Three of them found a reduction in headache frequency compared to placebo whereas the fourth showed no difference. In the negative study, however, the placebo group received a small dose of lidocaine so this may have been a confounding factor.  

  

Recommendation 

GON blocks may be used in migraine as a transitional treatment (short term effect to “switch off” a headache bout or provide temporary headache relief) in certain situations when the severity and frequency of the headaches is significant and other acute or preventive options are not available (i.e. pregnancy) or effective.  It may also be used as a temporary relief in the context of medication overuse headache when withdrawal of acute medication results in unbearable rebound headache. 

References and further resources

SIGN 155 Pharmacological management of migraine – updated March 2023; includes clinician and patient guidelines 

url: Pharmacological management of migraine (sign.ac.uk)  

British Association for the Study of Headache (BASH) National Management System 2019; includes clinician and patient portals 

url: Headache UK 

Editorial Information

Last reviewed: 11/10/2023

Next review date: 01/04/2025